WPP Group : advertising & marketing profile

Profile subscribers click here for full profile

British marketing giant WPP overtook long-time rival Omnicom for the first time in 2008 to become the world's biggest marketing group, as well as the most profitable. It has retained that position ever since, with revenues reaching a record high of $19.4bn in 2016. However, a sharp downturn in performance during 2017 was followed in early 2018 by an allegation that WPP's creator and CEO Sir Martin Sorrell had misused corporate assets, a charge he strenuously denied. With WPP's share price already in freefall, Sorrell stunned the global advertising community by resigning from the group he had assembled almost single-handedly over the space of 33 years to launch a new venture, S4 Capital. His successor Mark Read has since then been struggling to turn around the group's weakening performance. WPP owns four of the world's largest advertising agencies in J Walter Thompson, Ogilvy & Mather, Young & Rubicam and Grey. These are partnered by three global media networks Mindshare, Mediacom and Wavemaker, under the overall banner of GroupM. WPP also controls a substantial portfolio of market research, PR, direct marketing, design and consultancy subsidiaries. Whereas some rivals, like Omnicom and Interpublic, have largely avoided large acquisitions in recent years, WPP continued steadily to expand its portfolio in the 2000s, reinforcing Sorrell's reputation as arguably the industry's most skilled dealmaker. Among the more significant recent additions to the collection were digital advertising network 24/7 Real Media in 2007; global research group TNS, acquired during 2008 after a long and sometimes bitter siege; and top German marketing group Commarco, snapped up in 2011. The group's last $500m-plus acquisition was AKQA in 2012, but it continues to hoover up smaller businesses around the globe at an average rate of one a week during 2015, a year which also marked WPP's 30th anniversary.

Who are the competitors of WPP? See ranking of Leading Global Marketing Groups

Who are the clients of WPP? See individual agency profiles below for more

Subscribers only: Adbrands profile

J Walter Thompson

Other Agencies

Johannes Leonardo Asatsu-DK
Bates 141 United
Soho Square Santo
Tapsa LG Ad

Media

Group M KR Media
24/7 Real Media Kinetic

Public Relations

Chime Communications The Wexler Group
Ogilvy PR Buchanan Communications
Cohn & Wolfe RLM Finsbury

Design & Branding

The Brand Union Scott Stern
Coley Porter Bell Warwicks
Banner McBride BrownKSDP
Addison CB'a
BDGworkfutures icon
Lambie-Nairn

Direct & Relationship Marketing

OgilvyOne Syzygy
Geometry Global Concept!
Einson Freeman RTCdirect

Specialist Communications

Clockwork Capital Global Sportnet
Metro Group Spafax Airline Network
DigiReels Forward
Prism The Food Group

Recent stories from Adbrands Weekly Update:

Adbrands Weekly Update 29th Nov 2018: WPP was one of the surprise victors in the global Volkswagen brand creative review. The German auto giant confirmed allocation of its global business to three agencies. DDB - currently one of the brand's lead agencies in multiple markets - will retain the European account, while sister network BBDO keeps hold of Latin America through incumbent Brazilian agency Almap BBDO. Omnicom also keeps Australia and adds South Africa (from WPP's Ogilvy). However, WPP has been awarded the three key North American markets of the US, Canada and Mexico. It is forming a new entity to manage the business. The VW Partnership will include staff from creative agencies David and Taxi in the US and Canada respectively, as well as digital shop Possible, activation specialist Geometry Global and production division Hogarth. Cheil retains the brand in China. Major losers include Interpublic's Deutsch in the US and German indie Grabarz & Partner. (Could the latter end up under Omnicom's umbrella?). Publicis goes home empty-handed.

Adbrands Weekly Update 25th Oct 2018: It was another difficult week for WPP's new CEO Mark Read. On Monday, for the first time in more than a decade, the group lost its position as the world's most valuable marketing services group. WPP's declining share price had reduced its valuation to £13.2bn, or around $17bn, down from almost $30bn at its peak four years ago. Meanwhile Omnicom's value had risen to around $17.4bn. WPP's market cap took another steep tumble this morning (to around $14.5bn) following publication of 3Q results that were worse even than expected. Net revenues after pass-through costs were down 1.5% on a like-for-like basis (WPP's version of organic reported by other groups). That represented the group's worst performance for several years. On a reported basis, topline was down 0.8% to £3.8bn. The big problem remains North America, where LFL slumped 5.3%. The UK was also poor at negative 2.0%. The most serious declines are in WPP's advertising & media agencies which suffered a "significant deterioration" in the quarter, down 4.0% LFL. Kantar's research business was also negative at 1.2%. "Turning around WPP requires decisive action and radical thinking," said Read, "and our performance in the third quarter of 2018 reinforces our belief in that approach. As previously stated, our industry is facing structural change, not structural decline, but in the past we have been too slow to adapt, become too complicated and have under-invested in core parts of our business. There is much to do and we have taken a number of critical actions to address these legacy issues and improve our performance."

The first of these was the announcement that WPP's long-serving finance director Paul Richardson will step down during 2019 after 22 years with the company. His successor will be announced in due course. Another restructuring measure had already been announced. WPP said earlier in the week that its specialist health marketing networks Sudler, Ogilvy Commonhealth and GHG will in effect be eliminated in the US, absorbed instead into the existing VMLY&R, Ogilvy and Wunderman networks respectively. International outposts of those three healthcare networks will continue to operate, for the time being at least, under the WPP Health & Wellness banner.

Read also confirmed plans to press ahead with the long-anticipated divestment in part or whole of the struggling Kantar research division. "There is a significant opportunity to develop Kantar into the world's leading data, insights and consulting company," he said. "We believe in the potential for Kantar but given our many priorities, we need to make tough choices and we believe that the best way to unlock this potential is with a strategic or financial partner. The Board has approved a formal process to review the strategic options that will maximise share owner value. It is envisaged that WPP will remain a share owner with strategic links to ensure that the benefits to clients are realised. Preparations are underway, involving Kantar management, and unsolicited expressions of interest have been received."

Adbrands Weekly Update 11th Oct 2018: Not the best of weeks for WPP. Four big reviews ended in partial or total losses for the group. First up was GlaxoSmithKline's global media. GroupM handled most of the account worldwide, split between Mediacom, Mindshare and Essence. Omnicom's PHD had the US, Australia and New Zealand. However, the pharma group has chosen Publicis to carry forward the account, in a newly created dedicated unit, PlatformGSK. A few days later, Ford announced the results of its own review. All worldwide marketing has for years been handled by WPP agencies, latterly through a dedicated unit Global Team Blue. WPP will retain (for now?) media, direct and digital and activation, and its Hudson Rouge entity will continue to support secondary brand Lincoln. However worldwide creative for Ford transfers to BBDO, while Wieden & Kennedy will be "creative and innovation partner" for select projects. That marks a triumph for BBDO, which has been without a global car account since the loss of Mercedes to Publicis last year. "We accept this difficult decision with our heads held high," GTB CEO Satish Korde told his team. "WPP is assessing the impact and implications of this decision, which cannot be fully determined until more detail is known." Analysts estimate that Ford accounted for around 5% of WPP's revenues last year, of which creative contributed between 1% and 1.5%. The final blows came yesterday with the news that global media for American Express will transfer from Mindshare to UM; while United Airlines has picked a Dentsu Aegis Network team led by Carat and Merkle to take over from Wavemaker. Merkle will also take on social media, previously handled by Wunderman, although the latter will retain some digital production duties. Separately, Mark Read made two further personnel appointments at WPP. Lindsay Pattison was named as group chief client officer, filling a role that had been empty since Tamara Ingram became CEO of J Walter Thompson in 2016. Wunderman's UK CEO and network chief technology officer Stephan Pretorius was promoted to CTO across the whole WPP group.

Adbrands Weekly Update 6th Sep 2018: WPP finally confirmed Mark Read as group CEO and permanent successor to Sir Martin Sorrell. It's undoubtedly the right choice in the circumstances, bringing continuity and stability to the group following several months of uncertainty. Andrew Scott, who has been co-COO of WPP with Read since Sorrell's departure, will remain as chief operating officer. Read's appointment came a day before - finally - the release of WPP's results for 2Q. It was the last of the major groups to report. These showed a modest - very modest - improvement in performance, and the first like-for-like increase in sales for more than a year. Total revenues for the quarter were up 2.4% on a LFL basis (WPP's equivalent to organic growth reported by other groups) to £3.94bn. Net revenues less pass-through costs rose a less impressive 0.7% for the quarter to £3.20bn. WPP's weak point has been North America, where net revs less pass-throughs slumped 3.3%, offsetting solid 3.9% growth in Western Continental Europe. The UK was also lacklustre at 1.4%. Combined growth in other markets was 2.9% overall, with Latin America especially strong at 8.6% and mainland China up 9.0%. In terms of revenues by sector, data investment management - in other words Kantar research - was once again the weakest performer, reinforcing the likelihood that this business might be divested, as has been widely speculated. "As chief executive," said Read, "my focus will be on invigorating our company and returning the business to stronger, sustainable growth. Our review of strategy is underway, addressing our structure, our underperforming operations, particularly in the United States, and how we position the company for the future. We will provide an update by the year end." Despite the challenges on the topline, profits remained buoyant, primarily as a result of exceptional one-off gains from the sale of WPP's stakes in Globant, AppNexus and other part-owned businesses. Operating profit for the first half - a quarterly figure was not disclosed - was up over 16% and net profit by over 11% to £705m.

With all 2Q results now in, here's the current ranking for organic growth (or decline) in 2Q. Dentsu 5.9%, Interpublic 5.6%, WPP revenues 2.4% Omnicom 2.0%, WPP revenues less pass through costs 0.7% MDC -1.7%, Publicis -2.1%, Havas approx -4.1%.

Adbrands Weekly Update 16th Aug 2018: WPP is to depart its corporate HQ in London's Farm Street after more than three decades in residence. The office was originally part of J Walter Thompson, WPP's first big acquisition back in 1987. The move is seen as an attempt to make a fresh start following the departure of Sir Martin Sorrell, with whose tenure the Farm Street office is indelibly associated. The group will begin the search for a new HQ immediately; in the mean time, WPP will take up temporary residence in Sea Containers House on London's South Bank, alongside Ogilvy.

Adbrands Weekly Update 9th Aug 2018: WPP also got a much-needed confidence boost from Mars, which has consolidated all global media with the group's Mediacom network. Previously, the global account had been split three ways with Mediacom responsible for planning, while Publicis-owned Starcom and Zenith and Omnicom's OMD handled buying in around three-quarters of local markets, including the US and China and much of Europe. Combined billings are worth around $1.8bn annually. Meanwhile, Mondelez concluded another set of regional media reviews. This too yielded a significant dividend for WPP's GroupM media division. Dentsu Aegis Network's Carat retained the business in the UK & Ireland, but was replaced by Mindshare in Australia & New Zealand; by Wavemaker in India and another as yet unidentified WPP agency in Japan. Publicis-owned Spark Foundry wins the business in China and South East Asia.

More about WPP from Adbrands Weekly Update


Subscribe to Adbrands.net to access the full profile and account assignments


Brands & Activities

see full profile

Management

see full profile

Financials

see full profile

Background

Free for all users | see full profile for current activities: British-born Martin Sorrell began his marketing career working for sports rights guru Mark McCormack at IMG, shortly after leaving Harvard Business School. He joined Saatchi & Saatchi in 1976, eventually rising to the role of finance director. In the early 1980s it was Sorrell who arranged the funding that allowed the Saatchi brothers to embark on their big acquisition spree, initially in the UK and then in the US. As a result he gradually replaced Tim Bell, who had previously been the Saatchis' right hand man, as the effective "third brother". However while the Saatchis were putting together their biggest deal of all, the takeover of Ted Bates, Sorrell was setting up his own business on the side.

In 1986, Sorrell acquired a large stake in Wire & Plastic Products, a small publicly quoted manufacturer of shopfittings and supermarket baskets, and resigned from Saatchis to begin assembling his own group. Wary of this potential rival, the Saatchi brothers attempted to keep a controlling hand on the new enterprise by offering to provide 20% of its capital. Sorrell declined, but did agree to sell the brothers a reduced 10% shareholding. He then set out to use WPP as his vehicle for growth, picking up a handful of small marketing services businesses. By 1987, Saatchi's was facing serious repercussions from its Bates takeover as clients deserted the US agency. Meanwhile Sorrell was secretly buying shares in another US agency, J Walter Thompson. In June 1987, Sorrell made an unprecedented hostile bid for JWT. Though rebuffed by the US giant, Sorrell refused to take no for an answer, eventually raising his offer to £352m. At this level, JWT's board was forced to concede defeat. It was a staggeringly audacious deal. JWT's sales at the time were over £400m, while WPP's were a paltry £24m. But the business community was amazed by Sorrell's skill and nerve, agreeing to support the highly leveraged purchase. WPP's share price soared. The Saatchi brothers quickly took the opportunity to sell their 10% stake, convinced that Sorrell's huge ambition would come crashing down to earth.

In fact the crunch came sooner than anyone had expected. Only three months later, the world's financial markets were devastated by the stockmarket crash which became known as "Black Monday". Share prices for all companies fell dramatically, but WPP was particularly hard hit, virtually halving. Nevertheless the company continued spending, funding payments on its increasing borrowings out of the cash flow of other newly acquired companies. Conquest was set up in 1988 to service international clients, and this was followed by the purchase of Ogilvy & Mather in 1989 for a cool $862m in cash. The capture of O&M made WPP the world's biggest marketing group (overtaking Saatchi & Saatchi) but it left a huge £650m debt. A year later the Gulf war crisis sparked off another near-recession. This time WPP's financial position was far worse than it had been four years earlier. For much of 1991, the group was very close indeed to collapse. The only thing that persuaded WPP's bankers to hold their nerve was the fact that Sorrell himself agreed to invest £2m of his own money as a gesture of his absolute confidence in the company's credit-worthiness. Meanwhile, as WPP struggled to keep its head above water, it was overtaken by the growth of Omnicom and IPG, who pushed the British group into 3rd position.

In return for his personal investment, Sorrell put in place an instalment incentive package designed to reward him and his management team handsomely if WPP returned to full financial strength. He set about this with great energy, acquiring or investing in a huge number of additional companies, mostly in the marketing services sector. WPP was an early investor in digital media, building up a strong portfolio of new media content and consultancy businesses. By mid-1999, Sorrell's efforts had lifted WPP into the FTSE ranking of the UK's top 100 companies. At the same time, his personal incentive package matured, netting him almost £38m in WPP shares and cash.

Later the same year Sorrell unveiled a new incentive package for WPP's senior management. In return for reinvesting $20m in bonuses and cash back into WPP, the new scheme promised to pay out another $100m in bonuses to senior managers, including $30m to Sorrell, if WPP's total shareholder return by 2004 was among the top two in a ranking of 15 similar marketing services companies. Capping a great year, Sorrell was knighted for his services to the marketing industry. According to Prime Minister Tony Blair, Sorrell was one of several figures (among them Richard Branson) honoured because they had "left a mark on the century and will be beacons for the next century".

The next few months were comparatively quiet for WPP, although it continued to add a string of small marketing shops to its portfolio. The next big move came in Spring 2000, on the back of strong financial results for the previous year. In April WPP made a friendly approach to Young & Rubicam, offering the US agency's shareholders a one-third stake in a merged group, which would once again overtake Omnicom and Interpublic to become the #1 global marketing conglomerate. However Y&R's management team was not immediately receptive, and instead put in place a secret "white knight" deal with smaller rival Publicis, before tentatively agreeing to negotiations with WPP. The implication was that Y&R would talk to WPP, but on its own terms. If WPP's takeover bid went hostile, Y&R would merge with Publicis instead. By early May it looked as if Y&R had slipped off WPP's hook, and the company finally unveiled its plan to merge with Publicis. But shareholders were very unhappy with the new development, citing the very unsuccessful previous alliance between Publicis and FCB. At the same time Ford, a key client of Y&R, refused to back a deal with the French agency because of its affiliations with rival Renault. However Ford did already work with WPP's O&M network... Y&R was forced back to WPP's negotiating table and the deal was finally completed mid-month.

Meanwhile, WPP announced plans to launch a fourth global advertising network, rolling out the hitherto low-key Conquest brand globally. Singapore's Batey Ads and US-based Cole & Weber joined Conquest's 14 existing European offices to target medium-spend advertisers looking for global representation. The network was rebranded as Red Cell in early 2001. The group continued to complete a series of smaller deals that year, adding to its portfolio of marketing services companies, but it wasn't long before Sorrell was tempted to launch another big takeover. In summer 2001, WPP intervened in Havas Advertising's agreed merger with media group Tempus, launching a hostile counterbid. (See Tempus profile for more). Despite later attempts to pull out of the bid, WPP was confirmed as the new owner of Tempus by year's end.

In 2003, WPP snapped up failing British marketing group Cordiant Communications for a rock bottom price of £10m, a far cry from the £1.5bn at which it was once valued. WPP also took on Cordiant's £256m of debts. The acquisition was confirmed in late June 2003 after a brief skirmish with rival bidder Publicis. After initially attempting to force Cordiant into administration, Publicis withdrew from the fight, possibly because of indications that BAT and Pfizer, Bates Worldwide's last major clients, might not transfer their accounts to the French company. In September 2004, WPP was named the winning bidder in a contest to acquire Grey Global Group. The final bid was worth around $1.3bn net, split between cash and shares. A year later WPP was also linked to a possible bid for media service and research group Aegis. WPP was said to be interested primarily in Aegis's market research division, Synovate. The Carat and Vizeum networks would have been sold on to private equity group Hellman & Friedman. Any such speculation proved purely academic however. WPP eventually pulled out of any deal as a result of a fine display of brinksmanship by rival Aegis investor Vincent Bolloré.

Also in Autumn 2005, WPP generated some less welcome headlines after global creative director Neil French, already renowned for his outspoken opinions, made some ill-advised and apparently sexist comments about women in advertising at a marketing conference. As part of a speech criticizing women in advertising for spending too much time on childbearing and too little on hard work, he was reported to have said "Women don't make it to the top because they don't deserve to. They're crap." After a resulting barrage of negative media comment, he offered his resignation to Martin Sorrell in October 2005. Martin Sorrell himself made headlines that year after the terms of his divorce a few years earlier became public. The £30m payout to his former wife set a new UK record for a divorce settlement.

Another set of headlines followed in January 2006 after WPP instituted an investigation into possible fraud at its Italian operating business. Local manager Marco Benatti was fired at the beginning of the year. This led to further unwelcome attention on Sorrell's private life. A series of anonymous emails were circulated to media publications and WPP clients publicising the personal relationship between Sorrell and another WPP Italy employee, Daniela Weber, and also alleging financial impropriety. The emails appeared to originate from Fullsix, a digital agency founded by Marco Benatti and in which WPP was a minority shareholder. Sorrell and Weber later issued a lawsuit against Benatti and the managing director of Fullsix for libel and invasion of privacy. The case came to court in London in March 2007. Benatti offered compensatory damages without admitting his guilt. A subsequent lawsuit over his dismissal was settled privately out of court. See full profile for current activities


All rights reserved © Mind Advertising Ltd 1998-2018